If you visit http://www.ata.org/research/re...oadmap.php, you’ll find a roadmap to a cure for tinnitus.
The roadmap is logically and scientifically flawed, and may even lead research astray. Can you see what I mean? Check it out. Do you see how there underlying assumptions in the roadmap that may or may not be true, which therefore lead to potentially false conclusions?
I’ll post more on this later, and I am curious about your feedback. Can anyone else see the logical inconsistencies in the ATA’s roadmap? How can we help the ATA?
July 10th, 2009 update: Check out this graphic to see the current CureTinnitus.org Review of the ATA’s Roadmap to a Cure: